How do the network changes affect your trip?

Here's a great way to help people understand how a transit service change or project will affect them.

Houston METRO has released a new tool to help people understand the upcoming major changes to the city's transit system. It puts two trip planners side-by-side: one routing via routes in the existing network, the other via the routes of the New Bus Network

Screen Shot 2015-06-02 at 10.31.56 AM

Houston's transit network is about to change dramatically, and everyone is going to have to learn how to use the new one.This lets anybody quickly compare different trips trips to see both how a trip will go in the new system, and how long it will take.  It could be a great educational tool in the public consultation phase, not just when implementation is occurring.

It can also make the tradeoffs implied in the system redesign explicit. For example, in the trip above, a grid movement in southeast Houston is now much faster due to the reduced waiting times on frequent network routes in the area. Other transit systems implementing major changes would do well to build similar apps.

However, while the dual trip planner is great for understanding how the changes effect specific trips, it is less useful for developing a sense of how the overall mobility level changes across the city with the new network. As an extension of this same idea, a companion tool could be developed that would compare the transit isochrones of different points in Houston in the existing and new networks. Not only would a person be able to understand how specific trips from one point to another change, but how the area of the city (and all of the opportunities located within it) accessible by transit changes as well.

3 Responses to How do the network changes affect your trip?

  1. Claxton6 June 5, 2015 at 12:51 pm #

    Seems like you could also track the trips that people check in that tool, plot the time for the old system versus the time for the new system, and create a pretty simple scatterplot showing how they compare.

  2. Dave June 6, 2015 at 5:45 am #

    In addition to tracking which trips got shorter or longer, perhaps ask a couple questions about how people feel about the change and track those track those ratings. That could provide survey evidence to counteract the usual problem that people who are negatively impacted will complain loudly and those who benefit often say nothing. I agree that publicizing how much of my city I can now access quickly is a key metric to keep front and center!

  3. Brian Guy June 11, 2015 at 3:19 pm #

    I randomly selected two points for a suburb-to-suburb commute. The old commute was walk a few hundred feet, then wait for an infrequent bus, then transfer to another bus, then walk a few hundred feet. The new commute was walk under a half mile, then wait for a 15-minute bus, then transfer to another 15-minute bus, then walk under a half mile.
    The new commute was only one minute faster than the new commute. However, the old commute had a lot of that time waiting and riding (indirect routing) on each bus, while the new commute had a lot of that time walking. Since time moves faster in motion, the perceived time savings are surely greater.
    This is an excellent tool that should be replicated for all restructurings. May even be needed pre-adoption if a board and/or public were claiming it wouldn’t work.

Leave a Reply