shutting down new york? think of the kittens


Readers know I often find it necessary to wade into "efficiency vs emotion" debates, usually to point out that there are emotions at stake in efficiency too.  Yes, there were kitten lovers everywhere, including me, alarmed by the thought of two lost kittens on the tracks of the New York subway. There were also tens of thousands of stranded people missing their appointments and families and last-chance-to-see-dying-parents as two major subway lines were shut down to avoid hitting them. 

But you don't actually say that.


And of course some obsessive philosopher-geek will want to probe each cat-lover's definition of cute-enough-to-shut-down-a-city.  "What if they had been squirrels?" he'll ask.  "Squirrels are adorable too, but they're rodents, so if squirrels are to be saved, why aren't we braking for all the rats that are down there anyway — mmph!"  No, you gag the philosopher-geek for his own safety.

Unless you are a certain Republican candidate for mayor, you don't actually say that you'd have kept the trains running even if it brought two lost kittens to an untimely end.  If tempted, you see the angry mobs holding photos of kittens.  You see radicals among them hurling dead kittens at you, each bearing a little certificate that it died of natural causes.   You imagine that every internet cat pic, for the rest of your life, will be like an ad for your opponents.  


Social media have elevated the cat, and especially the cat picture, to a symbolic power not seen since Ancient Egypt.  You don't mess with that.

Which reminds me,  here's the complete collection of cat posts from my personal blog.  Here's an old pic of me holding Cody (1996-2009), whose safety I'd have personally shut down New York for:

000_me w cody

So yes, you efficiency-loving, reliability-loving urban technocrats!  There are purring, furry, carnivorous limits, and I'm there with the cat-lovers, astride the deserted subway tracks, yelling stop!  Isn't this a cute kitten?

5 Responses to shutting down new york? think of the kittens

  1. Jonathan Hallam September 2, 2013 at 3:59 am #


  2. Joe Busman September 2, 2013 at 9:20 am #

    We have evolved to the point where we might spend millions to save a single life, countless hours and staff digging to save a girl down a hole not to mention the hours and staff of media to cover it. By the same token, haven’t we also spent billions and stripped our Constitution to protect us against terrorism which killed fewer Americans in 2001 than cars or even drowning? However, keep in mind how incredibly productive we are and how much money we have at our disposal. If you looked up all the things the government spends on pork barrel, a few million to save kittens on a subway track is nothing. At the same time, even in transit planning, a single old person at a board meeting can stop the agency from raising fares for seniors or changing a route. Emotions rule us more than we would like to think. In fact, we are primarily irrational/emotional thinkers who only think we’re mostly rational.

  3. Carl September 6, 2013 at 9:00 am #

    Humans are not rational creatures. If a single life was this important, why have we not banned the car? Wouldn’t we be willing to be late for wrok for the sake of 30,000 human lives each year.

  4. Nathanael October 12, 2013 at 2:38 pm #

    So that’s why you’re wrong about so many things. 😉 Because you love murderious, amoral, psychopathic killers who devastate the ecology!
    (Only 90% kidding.)

  5. my computer desktop windows 10 January 11, 2018 at 11:30 pm #

    Look like very cute kitten and this type of pet which are very familiar with the humans very good. My cat is also very cute and notice my activity and try always play with me like a human baby.