I will be passing through Melbourne quickly early next week. My only public event is at Monash University, but it would be great to see you there! See details below!
I’m in Sydney and Melbourne the next two weeks, but sadly have no public events booked. After that, though, I’ll be in Auckland, New Zealand.
I’m really honored to be invited back to Auckland City Council’s Auckland Conversations series, 5:30-7:00 PM on 22 November. I’ll talk about “Transport Planning as Freedom Planning.” Sign up to attend here! It looks like there will be a livestream here.
The City Council’s website also did a nice little interview of me.
The event will include a panel featuring Jessica Rose from Women in Urbanism Auckland, the City’s senior hearings advisor Eddie Tuiavii, Auckland Transport Manager of Strategic Projects Daniel Newcombe, and my old friend Ludo Campbell-Reid, the head of Auckland’s Design Office and its official Design Champion (great title!)
Auckland has just finished rolling out a new bus network that I helped design back in ’12, and is one of the most exciting cities anywhere for public transport and sustainable urbanism right now. I’m looking forward to riding some buses there!
On October 2 at lunchtime in Washington DC, I will be debating Randal O’Toole, a longtime critic of both city planning and most public transit, at that famous redoubt of libertarians, the Cato Institute.
You can also watch it online. Should be fun!
It looks like most everyone had a great time at my Interactive Course in Transit Network Design in Washington DC last Friday and Saturday. The feedback might help you decide if it's worth the money to sign up for a future session, or to bring the course to your own city.
If you'd be interested in the sound of my voice, ruminating broadly about transit and cities in the serenity of my own livingroom, there's now quite a good podcast by Colin Marshall in the Notebook on Cities and Culture series. You can download an mp3 from Colin's site here, or get it from iTunes here.
Colin's a brilliant interviewer, asking great and often surprising questions. He draws me out on my own living arrangements, my complex relationships with Portland and with Los Angeles, some notes on my global transit travels, and finally onto really substantive topics about what transit is and how it relates to the larger question of what cities are. It's all feels very public-radio …
Colin's whole series of downloadable podcasts looks like it's worth a look, as he's put me in some impressive company …
Erin Chantry, of Tindale Oliver urban designers, wrote a nice little piece about the Congress for the New Urbanism panel where I spoke alongside G.B. Arrington of Parsons Brinckeroff. I promised a little fire and brimstone, but apparently I came off as way too reasonable.
My fun faux-debate with Darrin Nordahl last night, sponsored by Town Hall and Transportation Choices, has been covered by both the Seattle Times and the online journal Publicola. Both summarize the question as something like: "Should transit be useful or fun?" Put that way, it's easy to say yes to both, but there really are some choices to be made, because often we're asked to sacrifice the useful for the fun. As I said in the debate, I support all of Darrin's recommendations for a more joyous transit experience, except where the abundance and usefulness of service must be sacrificed to achieve them.
San Francisco artist Todd Gilens has four major works now on display in that city. To find them, though, you'll need a special bus tracker:
From the Muni Diaries:
Instead of thinking about buses an advertising space, Gilens wondered if buses can be a vehicle for visual impact. “We use buses without thinking, like using a paper towel, but what if we used images to transform the bus, to give an emotive quality to buses?”
They're quite beautiful:
Images of all four buses are here. Just click the little forward and back buttons.
Todd lays out the background for his work in a short statement here, and in a longer article in Antennae (PDF here). Here's his conceptual bridge from transit to endangered species, by way of urban form:
A way to think of settlement patterns would be: how can mutual needs or living space be courteously accommodated? Just as we do when crowded around other humans (as on a bus for example) being close enough to all fit while everyone gets at least somewhat of the space they need. In the framework of regional settlement, this means checking to see if the streams, the coyotes, the polliwogs or ferns are not getting trampled, and if they are, maybe shifting over a bit to give them some room.
It was courageous of Todd to even tell me about this project, given what I've written elsewhere about advertising wraps. I also long to see bus exteriors used for the primary mission of helping people figure out the bus system. I especially like simple color-coding schemes that distinguish fundamentally different kinds of service, such as the simple Los Angeles paint scheme where red means Rapid and orange means Local.
But as a temporary exhibit, which is what this is, I'm all for it. These buses operate through surprise. (True beauty is always surprising, which is why it can be hard to appreciate in a museum.) So even if the bus wraps were permanent, their beauty would diminish as people got used to them.
The four buses will be wrapped through the end of March and a bit into April.
It turns out that the excellent blog Portland Transport created a really clear video of the Portland version of my presentation, “A Field Guide to Transit Quarrels.” Only tonight have I had both the time and the bandwidth to look at it. Apart from the well-amplified sniffles from my cold at the time, it looks and sounds pretty good. Thanks to Bob Richardson and everyone else at Portland Transport who made it happen. Continue Reading →