Archive | June, 2009

Frequent Network Maps: An Obvious Idea That Took Forever to Happen

Muni bit If you know San Francisco at all, take a look at Steve Boland’s new map of its high-frequency “main lines.”   It’s quite deservedly copyrighted, so I’ve shown just a taste of it here.

For years I’ve advocated that transit agencies need to produce clear maps of their high-frequency networks, so that people can quickly see where they can go without waiting long.  I also argue that these maps should be on the wall of every planner, everyone making decisions about social services, indeed everyone who decides where to locate anything.  Because ultimately, the most effective public transit is what happens when the city grows in response to the transit network — just as all cities did until about 1945.

Continue Reading →

Unhelpful Word Watch: Convenient

A Transport Politic post on US high-speed rail today contains this quotation from Amtrak CEO Joseph Boardman:

With high-speed rail, speed is not the issue.  Convenience and trip times are.

What does he mean by convenience?  For that matter, what do you mean by convenience?  I’ve been hearing this word in conversations about transit for more than 20 years, and in this context, I’m pretty sure it doesn’t mean anything.

Continue Reading →

Meanwhile, in Tehran

Today seems to be the climax of the conflict in Iran, and I’m up far too late following the news.  What’s it about?  The truth.  Huge numbers of citizens are risking their lives to create a more truthful society, one needing fewer lies.  If we think about what we advocate as environmentalists or urbanists or transit advocates, it’s ultimately just that, I hope.  We’re looking for clarity, truth.  We’re trying to see through the murk (some natural, some man-made) and give others the courage to do the same.

Continue Reading →

Mundane Things That Really Matter: Defining “On Time”

DSCN2078

A great piece by Michael Perkins in Greater Greater Washington highlights a perennial problem with on-time performance measures for urban buses.  He cites the policy of the Washington area transit agency, WMATA, which says that a bus is considered on-time if it’s no more than two minutes early and no more than seven minutes late.  Perkins explains, with diagrams, that under this policy you could wait 19 minutes for a bus that supposedly ran every ten minutes, and yet the bus (and the one 19 minutes in front of it) would both be considered on-time.

(By the way, the WMATA standard sounds lax to me, though I haven’t done a survey.   Few agencies I’ve worked with accept anything more than five minutes late, or one minute early.)

Continue Reading →

Slippery Word Watch: Express

A good post at Greater Greater Washington on Washington DC priority bus corridors reminds me of an old question about the word express:

Metro is working hard to develop “priority bus corridors,” with express buses that run more often, more quickly, and more reliably than existing service

What does express mean in that sentence?  It’s not clear, but it seems to be the everyday meaning: “fast, with a dash of coolness, compared to local-stop service.”

Like a lot of transit planners, I use the word express in a more precise sense, as one of three kinds of stopping pattern that seem to encompass most successful transit services:

Stopping patterns

Continue Reading →

When Expansion is Dilution

Demonstration-1-Large Metro Rapid

My post on crowdsourcing bus stop design included a pitch for the importance of branding in making a particular quality of service visible.  I cited the obvious example of the Los Angeles Metro Rapid, the region’s network of frequent and relatively fast buses.   Integral to the Rapid product was a distinctive logo, colour scheme, and on the first lines at least, shelter design.

But Los Angeles commenters such as Wad pounced, reminding me that as the Rapid brand expanded, bits of it started falling off:

Continue Reading →

The Revolution on Transit

385px-Tehran_Metro-Azadi_Station Amid the mounting civil unrest in Iran’s capital, when everyone fears that mass violence may be imminent, let’s pause to notice that the Tehran Metro is still running.

Andrew Sullivan‘s wall-to-wall coverage includes this cellphone-video record of a ride on the Metro on this exuberant and anxious day.

It’s an immense challenge to keep a transit system running in such conditions.  Transit operations are a real-time collaboration of many people with different political views.  The fierce disagreement inflaming the population must also divide and arouse the transit workforce.  Some may even feel tempted to distort the operation in a way that benefits their side of the conflict.   In such conditions the necessary teamwork becomes a real test of an operating company and its staff.
Obviously, there are baser considerations at work.  I’m sure the government would have shut down the metro — which is clearly helping the opposition assemble larger crowds than the government can muster — if they didn’t need to maintain the illusion that life is normal in Tehran apart from a few hooligans.
But I just want to recognise the ordinary drivers and dispatchers and attendants who are keeping the Metro running in these days of terrifying uncertainty.  It’s not just diligence, it’s courage.

Crowdsourcing Bus Stop Design

Bus_Stop_Final1 Bus stops can be pretty basic, or pretty elaborate.  Aaron Antrim points me to a Utah-based project, Next Stop Design, that collects ideas for bus stop design from the public, then allows users to rate them.  Such a project on a large enough scale could start to generate some “wisdom of crowds” about what kinds of bus stops people like.  (This currently leading design, a “covered-wagon” theme for Utah, is by “hopkimp,” details here.) Continue Reading →

Did Sim City Make Us Stupid?

250px-SimCity_Classic_cover_art My post on the lack of good simulation games triggered this reverie from Peter, regarding the city-planning simulation game, Sim City:

Ah, SimCity.  … As a youngster I spent many hours building fields of residential tract housing, industrial parks, huge blighted and substantially vacant commercial districts, mega-highways connecting them all, and Godzilla.

When I recently discovered that the original SimCity was released as open source, I had to download it and try it out. I knew that it was inaccurate, but it was nostalgia. Then I discovered exactly how inaccurate it was. “No mixed residential and commercial areas?!? WTF!” I did play it long enough to also notice that transportation was pretty much a capital expenditure with no operating costs. Sigh.

Yes, those are the two of the worst fallacies built into the original Sim City:  

Continue Reading →