Quiz: When is service every 20 minutes worse than service every 30 minutes?
Answer: When it relies on a pulse, or what Americans usually call timed transfer, with routes that run every 30. Continue Reading →
Archive | November, 2010
Melbourne: A Frequent Network Map
Peter Parker of Melbourne on Transit recently sketched some frequent network maps for that city, the second largest in Australia. You can find a range of efforts for various cities using the Frequent Network category. My original post arguing for the value of frequent network maps is here.
Although Melbourne is mostly flat and its street network is mostly gridded, it’s striking how few crosstown or “orbital” services they are. Over the past few years the main government initiative in this area has been the SmartBus program, a set of new frequent orbital routes. Yet compared to comparably dense parts of Los Angeles, say, the grid is thin. Continue Reading →
Seattle: Notes on the “Snowpocalypse”
As Seattle moves into the recriminations phase on last week’s snowstorm, locally known as the “snowpocalypse,” let’s put some things in perspective:
Seattle has a particular vulnerability to snow and ice that is unique in North America. The uniqueness is in the intersection of four factors: Continue Reading →
Thanksgiving English Quiz: Grammar in The New York Times
Can this sentence, from the New York Times article on the DeLay conviction, be read as anything other than evidence of the collapse of journalism, and hence of language, and hence of civilization?
To be guilty of money laundering, the prosecution had to show the money had been obtained through an illegal activity before it was laundered.
They succeeded in showing that, so I guess that means the prosecution is guilty of money laundering.
This is the frigging NYTimes! Are there no editors sharp-eyed enough to change “To be guilty of …” to “To prove …” ? Predicates need subjects! Otherwise they run wild and incriminate innocent people.
Update: Commenter GD provides the necessary transit angle on this story:
William Safire is rotating in his grave. The question now is how to harness that energy and power rail transit with it 😉
Happy Thanksgiving to American readers. If you had to fly in the USA yesterday, I hope it was stimulating.
Los Angeles: Some Thoughts on the Challenge for “The Source”
The blog of the main Los Angeles transit agency, The Source, interviewed me recently on the challenges and opportunites of Los Angeles as a transit metropolis. It was a chance to pull some of the main themes of this blog together as applied to that fascinating city. They’ve published it in two parts, but here is the whole thing: Continue Reading →
Seattle + Snow = Futility
Dear Seattle readers, if you still haven’t figured out that you need to stay home, watch this. Its a slice of life on John Street, Capitol Hill, Seattle, yesterday evening.
The transit angle on the story appears at 2:43. Good thing nobody used the bike rack.
Stay home!
Washington DC: Agency Seeks Comment on Frequent Network Map
Washington DC’s transit agency WMATA is preparing to publish a frequent network map, and wants your comments. To start, they’re taking the approach of showing frequency as a highlight on the main network map, as this makes it easier to show how multiple overlaid routes combine to form a frequent line. Continue Reading →
Connections vs Complexity
In my first “basics” post on connections, I explained why a network that requires connections (or as North Americans call them, “transfers”) can actually get people where they’re going faster than a network that tries to avoid them.
But there’s another important reason to plan for connections rather than direct service, one that should be important to anyone who wants transit to be broadly relevant to urban life: Unless you welcome and encourage connections, your network will become very, very complex. Continue Reading →
Connection Fare Penalties: Why They Happen
Is it fair to have to pay more if your trip requires a transfer or connection? I’ve argued that it isn’t, but I also have an appreciation of the difficulty of eliminating these penalties. So when complaining about a fare penalty, try to understand the situation from the transit agency’s point of view. Not because they’re right and you’re wrong, but because you many need to help them solve the problem that it presents for them. Continue Reading →
Connection Penalties as “de facto Redlining”?
Sometimes a comment is so representative of a common point of view that I want to share it even though I neither agree or disagree exactly. Sometimes too, a comment raises a language point that’s worth noticing. From David Vartanoff: Continue Reading →